A Brand does typically spend much much more on its own website than on its social networks presence (if it has one) so if not careful, doing so might mean actually losing these visitors as potential active fan of the Brand, to become at best simple passive observers of some Brand-related activity.
However, I am not convinced by Jeremiah’s matrix on the Evolution of Social Media Integration and Corporate Websites. Or rather, I do not see it as a “must follow this path” for all Brands. Let’s just take the last stage for example: “Complete integration between corporate site and social sites”. I can think of most of the Brands in the luxury goods sector that would not benefit from such an integration. This would lower the Brand name status too much to the level of just another network relation such as a friend on Facebook. The Brand would risk losing its exclusive image, its capacity to generate and fulfill dreams. Luxury Brands would need to maintain this image online and a complete integration with social media would make this difficult.
Marci Ikeler from Publicis has a very good presentation on slideshare “Digital strategies for luxury Brands”.
Digital Strategies for Luxury Brands
She mentions the successful examples of Gucci on Facebook and MAC on twitter, both of which support the Brand image instead of “cheapening it”. I noted this statement supporting Jeremiah’s first point: “The most successful luxury digital campaigns are fully integrated with a larger digital strategy and align with the brand’s values”. But do not confuse this with a complete integration of the Brand’s website and social media!View more presentations from Marci Ikeler.
You must read the chapter 10. Use digital to convey exclusivity (slides 43 to 45). It shows 2 examples of exclusive social networking, illustrating why complete social mass media integration will not be beneficial for all Brands.
No comments:
Post a Comment